META - LEADERSHIP
_____________
Definition Function Reflection
DEFINTION
Meta-Leadership is an individual person's / small group's role and capacity strategically to determine, to navigate, to provide guidance, direction, and momentum, to fusion dynamics and complexities across public / private organizations, their sections, interfaces, and stakeholders by inspiration, catalytic communication and coordination as well as integration and unification of authorities.
Meta-Leadership is provided by personalities of understanding and catalyzing based on self-awareness, self-knowledge, self-regulation, self-guidance in order to navigate the diversity of facets of being, thinking, doing. A Meta-Leader is a sovereign human independently reflecting and masterig him/herself, acting detached and out of self-control being internally in order, disposing about relevant insights and an outward mindset as well as a wider perception and deeper understanding of a broad human multi-dimensional panorama of resonating intentions, targets, motives, adequate relationships, connectivities, interdependencies.
On this background of holistic mindset 'Good Meta-Leadership' can be defined as the transpersonal capacity of modeling, fostering, facilitating ethics and organizational / societal values as well as inclusiveness and communality by envisioning imagination, inspiring clear and open communication, and persuading effective leveraging for inter- / action. Good Meta-Leadership is always especially to identify by the self-mastery of the laws of thought, spiritual guidance, and intellectual capacities.
An ideal Meta-Leader cannot only to be understood as a creative and interdisciplinary connector and determinator, but as a facilitator of transformationally qualifying processes based on transcendent connectedness and transparent consequences, - and in best case: an implementer of meta-governance by ruling / governing out of transcendence and metaphysical knowledge and its legitimation.
FUNCTION
a Meta-Leader determinatively communicates and coordinates ... by shaping / steering / monitoring the entire governing process, the input and the output of the governing system(s), and "super-vision" as a relative monopoly of organized intelligence ensuring coherence
providing a reflexive, multi-perspective and/or "bird's-eye" view in policy making, institutional, and organizational design regarding the ethical principles / values / norms / codes of conduct
developing strategies, setting and monitoring targets, forming partnerships, structures of vertical and horizontal organizational / institutional governmentality
managing the complexity, plurality, and tangled hierarchies: power-sharing, negotiation, conflict conciliation and communication, on both the inter- and intra-institutional / organizational levels
coordinating the reciprocal interdependence among operationally autonomous actors, organizations, and functional systems hierarchical, market, and network governance: the systems' relationship to institutional orders and functional systems including civil society
combining different ideas, methods, mechanisms, strategies, and styles of governance also referring to self-organizing, inter-organizational / institutional networks: the rules of self-regulation and the conditions of self-steering / -regulating policy networks
strategic-relationally approaching the social structures, legal norms, hierarchies and legitimacy, standards, benchmarks, performance indicators, quality controls, in- / compatibilities and best practice
selective strategizing in collaborative policy innovation networks to establish concerted policy action by framing, designing, facilitating participation / inclusion
redesigning networks, facilitating normative change and the legal / juridical re-regulation of structures, forms, and objectives by organizing the conditions for self-organization and "collibration" ...
REFLECTION
The transpersonally qualifying essence of a Meta-Leader is not only the main precondition of highly innovative and progressive MetaGovernance / MetaGoverning but a sustainibly shaping spirit for the culture and the sustaining significance of a public / private organization - regional as well as global.
Without the dependency on / restriction of formal authority a Meta-Leader follows his/her developed, transcendentally connected self implementing sovereign guidance based on 'auctoritas' with nobility and real aristocracy ('the best'). Even without any historic analogy of so called leadership (like in times of absolutism, feudalism, revanchism, papism, paternalism etc.) s/he transformatively guarantees the quantitative legitimation by integral communication / coordination and - even more important - saves the qualitative legitimation by inter- / acting based on secular- transcendent consciousness.
Meta-Leadership in this way dissolves the traditional systems' principal-agent-dilemma. Transparency, inclusion, concentric dialogue garantuee consequence and continuity of processing perception and internalization, real participation and creative solution. The trust generating and truth finding avenue of adequate communication creates not only procedural, but substantial justice and its processing. This also and especially applies to the area of internal / external crises and conflicts.
Meta-Leadership defined as above is based on the power of free mind and soul and the openly clearing consciousness of an individually guiding self. In order to guarantee the best usage and effectivity there is the need of equivalently resonating individual subjects also with potentials of freeing mind and processing openess. Because more important than to claim the right of freedom is to perform the substantial duty of developing position-dependent accountable usage of freedom. Meta-Leadership works the best in the way of highest possible individual self-regulation of every participant including transpersonalized responsibility and capacities of a real good will. These characteristics are the corresponding components of the Meta-Leader's determinative rationality and conviction as the decisive pillars of his/her real power.
The multi-facetted challenges of the anthropocenic age desire to answer the question of a human adequate future design / concept. Regardless of religious / ideological systems or traditional priorities of relevances there seems to be no more room for egomaniacal projective "absolutistic leadership" and furtherly ressources to waste by trials and errors. Independently of the size and/or societal function of an organizational unit, Meta-Leadership as outlined contains the basic components and necessary cognitive systematic determinants of future meta- / governance creation for adequately (self-) ruling / governing the inner / outer order of human societies on this planet s a space of free will.
M E T A - L E A D E R S H I P
_____________
No comments:
Post a Comment